Complementary and alternative medicines and liver disease.

Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) include conventional medical treatments. Patients worldwide use CAM at alarming rates; thus, reports of CAM-related DILI have been on the rise. The clinical presentations include asymptomatic liver test abnormalities, acute hepatitis with or without jaundice, acute cholestatic liver disease (bland or with hepatitis), acute liver failure, severe hepatitis with features of portal hypertension, and acute decompensation of known or unknown cirrhosis that can lead to acute-on-chronic liver failure. Acute hepatitis with or without necrosis, hepatocellular and canalicular cholestasis, herb-induced or CAM-triggered autoimmune hepatitis, granulomatous hepatitis, severe steatohepatitis, and vanishing bile duct syndrome are common liver biopsy findings in CAM-DILI. The presence of preexisting liver disease predicts severe liver injury, risk of progression to liver failure, and decreased transplant-free survival in patients with CAM-DILI. This review discusses global epidemiology and trends in CAM-DILI, clinical presentation, assessment and outcomes, commonly emerging threats in the context of hepatotoxic herbs, pragmatic assessment of "liver beneficial" herbs and health care myths, patient communication, regulatory framework, and future directions on research in CAM.

Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important adverse drug reaction that can lead to acute liver failure or even death in severe cases. Currently, the diagnosis of DILI still follows the strategy of exclusion. Therefore, a detailed history taking and a thorough and careful exclusion of other potential causes of liver injury is the key to correct diagnosis. This guideline was developed based on evidence-based medicine provided by the latest research advances and aims to provide professional guidance to clinicians on how to identify suspected DILI timely and standardize the diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Based on the clinical settings in China, the guideline also specifically focused on DILI in chronic liver disease, drug-induced viral hepatitis reactivation, common causing agents of DILI (herbal and dietary supplements, anti-tuberculosis drugs, and antineoplastic drugs), and signal of DILI in clinical trials and its assessment.

Checkpoint inhibitor hepatotoxicity: pathogenesis and management.

Immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, has been a paradigm shift in cancer therapeutics, producing durable cancer responses across a range of primary malignancies. ICI drugs increase immune activity against tumor cells, but may also reduce immune tolerance to self-antigens, resulting in immune-mediated tissue damage. ICI-associated hepatotoxicity usually manifests as hepatocellular enzyme elevation and may occur in 2%-25% of ICI-treated patients. Although ICI-associated hepatotoxicity is clinically and pathologically distinct from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis, our understanding of its pathogenesis continues to evolve. Pending greater understanding of the pathophysiology, mainstay of management remains through treatment with high-dose corticosteroids. This approach works for many patients, but up to 30% of patients with high-grade hepatotoxicity may not respond to corticosteroids alone. Furthermore, atypical cholestatic presentations are increasingly recognized, and rare cases of fulminant hepatitis due to ICI hepatotoxicity have been reported. Optimal management for these challenging patients remains uncertain. Herein, we review the current understanding of pathogenesis of ICI-associated toxicities, with a focus on hepatotoxicity. Based on the existing literature, we propose evolving management approaches to incorporate strategies to limit excess corticosteroid exposure, and address rare but important presentations of cholestatic hepatitis and fulminant liver failure. Finally, as ICI hepatotoxicity frequently occurs in the context of treatment for advanced malignancy, we review the impact of hepatotoxicity and its treatment on cancer outcomes, and the overall safety of re-challenge with ICI, for patients who may have limited treatment options.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events (AU)

El descubrimiento de los inhibidores de checkpoint inmu nológicos (ICI) es uno de los logros más importantes en los últimos años en Oncología. Sin embargo, su uso en aumen to ha conlllevado a un incremento de los efectos adversos inmunomediados (irAEs). Los eventos hepáticos y gastroin testinales incluyen la hepatitis, colitis y síntomas de tracto digestivo superior, que son de los irAEs más frecuentes, con incidencias entre el 2 % y 40 %, esta última en paciente tratados con combo de ICI. Basados en la evidencia científica tanto de ensayo clínicos randomizados como de estudio de vida real, este documento de consenso aporta recomenda ciones sobre el diagnóstico, tratamiento y pronóstico de los efectos adversos hepáticos y gastrointestinales asociados con la inmunoterapia. (AU)

Toxicidad hepática por fingolimod / Hepatic toxicity by fingolimod

We present the case of a patient with a history of multiple sclerosis under chronic fingolimod treatment who presents abdominal pain associated with jaundice associated with transaminitis that by biopsy is associated with late hepatotoxicity due to fingolimod. (AU)

Se presenta el caso de una paciente con antecedente de esclerosis múltiple en manejo con fingolimod de manera crónica quien presenta dolor abdominal asociado a ictericia asociado a transaminitis que por biopsia se asocia a hepatotoxicidad tardía debido a fingolimod. (AU)

Liver injury in cynomolgus monkeys following intravenous and intrathecal scAAV9 gene therapy delivery.

Hepatotoxicity associated with intravenous/intrathecal adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy has been observed in preclinical species and patients. In nonhuman primates, hepatotoxicity following self-complementary AAV9 administration varies from asymptomatic transaminase elevation with minimal to mild microscopic changes to symptomatic elevations of liver function and thromboinflammatory markers with microscopic changes consistent with marked hepatocellular necrosis and deteriorating clinical condition. These transient acute liver injury marker elevations occur from 3-4 days post intravenous administration to ∼2 weeks post intrathecal administration. No transaminase elevation or microscopic changes were observed with intrathecal administration of empty capsids or a "promoterless genome" vector, suggesting that liver injury after cerebrospinal fluid dosing in nonhuman primates is driven by viral transduction and transgene expression. Co-administration of prednisolone after intravenous or intrathecal dosing did not prevent liver enzyme or microscopic changes despite a reduction of T lymphocyte infiltration in liver tissue. Similarly, co-administration of rituximab/everolimus with intrathecal dosing failed to block AAV-driven hepatotoxicity. Self-complementary AAV-induced acute liver injury appears to correlate with high hepatocellular vector load, macrophage activation, and type 1 interferon innate virus-sensing pathway responses. The current work characterizes key aspects pertaining to early AAV-driven hepatotoxicity in cynomolgus macaques, highlighting the usefulness of this nonclinical species in that context.

Contribution of gut microbiota to drug-induced liver injury.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is caused by various drugs with complex pathogenesis, and diverse clinical and pathological phenotypes. Drugs damage the liver directly through drug hepatotoxicity, or indirectly through drug-mediated oxidative stress, immune injury and inflammatory insult, which eventually lead to hepatocyte necrosis. Recent studies have found that the composition, relative content and distribution of gut microbiota in patients and animal models of DILI have changed significantly. It has been confirmed that gut microbial dysbiosis brings about intestinal barrier destruction and microorganisms translocation, and the alteration of microbial metabolites may cause or aggravate DILI. In addition, antibiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation are all emerging as prospective therapeutic methods for DILI by regulating the gut microbiota. In this review, we discussed how the altered gut microbiota participates in DILI.

Nomenclature, diagnosis and management of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarises the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between the Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and the condition often resolves spontaneously after withdrawal of the implicated drug, whereas patients with AIH mostly require long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow-up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements (such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia) have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow for a precise diagnosis, while there is similarly no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. We propose a management algorithm for patients with liver injury and an autoimmune phenotype. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterisation of this condition.

[Standardize the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury, and strengthen clinical and translational research].

As a liver disease with the most complex clinical phenotype, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) poses great challenges in diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Although guidelines based on the latest research advances can provide clinicians with guidance on the identification, diagnosis, and management of DILI, the overall level of evidence in this field is relatively low and high-level evidence is limited. Therefore, we should interpret guidelines with caution and look forward to more clinical and translational research to address the huge unmet clinical needs in DILI.

[Chinese guideline for diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury (2023 version)].

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important adverse drug reaction that can lead to acute liver failure or even death in severe cases. Currently, the diagnosis of DILI still follows the strategy of exclusion. Therefore, a detailed history taking and a thorough and careful exclusion of other potential causes of liver injury is the key to correct diagnosis. This guideline was developed based on evidence-based medicine provided by the latest research advances and aims to provide professional guidance to clinicians on how to identify suspected DILI timely and standardize the diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Based on the clinical settings in China, the guideline also specifically focused on DILI in chronic liver disease, drug-induced viral hepatitis reactivation, common causing agents of DILI (herbal and dietary supplements, anti-tuberculosis drugs, anti-neoplastic drugs), and signal and assessment of DILI in clinical trials.

[Comparative analysis of clinical diagnosis and treatment guidelines for drug-induced liver injury at home and abroad].

Drug-induced liver injury influencing factors are complex and have diverse clinical manifestations. Simple and reliable diagnostic methods are still deficient, and further classification of toxicological mechanisms is required. There are numerous pertinent discrepancies between domestic and international guidelines aimed at drug-induced liver injury diagnosis and treatment, with partial to no consensus on the content. The American Gastroenterological Association's 2021 Clinical Guidelines, the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver's 2021 Consensus Guidelines, the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences' 2020 International Consensus, the European Society's Hepatology Committee's 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the 2015 Chinese Medical Association Guidelines are five influential clinical guidelines on drug-induced liver injury at home and abroad. The epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and evaluation, treatment management, and other contents, particularly traditional Chinese medicine, were compared and analyzed using other relevant consensus opinions or guidelines in order to improve understanding and provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury.

[Advances in clinical diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury in children].

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most common adverse drug reactions that may seriously threaten the health of children and is receiving increasing clinical attention day by day. There is still no independent diagnosis and treatment guideline for DILI in children, but its clinical features are not completely similar to those in adults. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment progress in order to provide a reference for the management of DILI in children.

tRF-Gln-CTG-026 ameliorates liver injury by alleviating global protein synthesis.

tsRNAs (tRNA-derived small RNAs), as products of the stress response, exert considerable influence on stress response and injury regulation. However, it remains largely unclear whether tsRNAs can ameliorate liver injury. Here, we demonstrate the roles of tsRNAs in alleviating liver injury by utilizing the loss of NSun2 (NOP2/Sun domain family, member 2) as a tsRNAs-generating model. Mechanistically, the loss of NSun2 reduces methyluridine-U5 (m5U) and cytosine-C5 (m5C) of tRNAs, followed by the production of various tsRNAs, especially Class I tsRNAs (tRF-1s). Through further screening, we show that tRF-Gln-CTG-026 (tG026), the optimal tRF-1, ameliorates liver injury by repressing global protein synthesis through the weakened association between TSR1 (pre-rRNA-processing protein TSR1 homolog) and pre-40S ribosome. This study indicates the potential of tsRNA-reduced global protein synthesis in liver injury and repair, suggesting a potential therapeutic strategy for liver injury.

Autophagy-Based Intervention Strategy in the Management of Hepatotoxicity.

Significance: Ample evidence has demonstrated an important role for autophagy as either a protective mechanism or a cause for hepatotoxicity, denoting the likely potentials for targeting autophagy in the prevention or treatment of hepatotoxicity. Recent Advances: The functional role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of hepatotoxicity has been gradually recognized. Mechanistically, the autophagy-mediated protective or promoting effect on hepatotoxicity is attributed to its functions in regulation of oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, lipid metabolism, iron homeostasis, inflammatory response, and programmed cell death. Targeting autophagy as a novel strategy for fighting against hepatotoxicity has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in a number of models. Critical Issues: Clarifying the precise functional role of autophagy in different types of hepatotoxicity is essential for developing a type-specific autophagy-based intervention. Identification of molecular targets and novel agents for effectively and accurately manipulating autophagy is needed for better utilization of an autophagy-based approach to exert beneficial effects on hepatotoxicity. Future Directions: Well-designed clinical trials are needed to validate the efficacy of an autophagy-targeting intervention strategy for hepatotoxicity. Further studies should be also focused on developing novel autophagy-targeting agents that can accurately regulate autophagy based on the characteristics of each type of hepatotoxicity. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 38, 1082-1100.

Hedyotis diffusa alleviate aflatoxin B1-induced liver injury in ducks by mediating Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), the most harmful aflatoxins, is a frequent contamination in feed and food items, raising global concerns in animal production and human public health. Also, AFB1 induces oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, mutations, and DNA lesions through its metabolic transformation into aflatoxin B1-8,9-epoxide (AFBO) by cytochrome P450 (CYP450). Hedyotis diffusa (HD) is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine known for its multiple pharmacological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory. Yet, the influence of HD on AFB1-induced liver injury in ducks is still unknown. Here, we investigated whether HD positively affects AFB1-induced liver injury in ducks. Results revealed that I) AFB1 caused significant changes in serum biochemical indices and decreased growth performance of ducks (such as ALT, AST, ALP, TP, ALB, final body weight, and body weight gain), whereas HD supplementation at 200 mg/kg mitigated these alterations. II) HD alleviated hepatic histopathological changes and liver index induced by AFB1 in ducks. III) HD significantly attenuated AFB1-induced oxidative stress, as measured by increased antioxidant enzyme activities such as SOD, GPx, and T-AOC and decreased MDA levels. Furthermore, HD reduced the level of AFB1-DNA adduct in duck liver. IV) HD significantly promoted the transcriptional expression of NF-E2-related nuclear factor 2 (Nrf2) and associated genes, including heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), NAD(P)H dehydrogenase quinone 1 (NQO1), glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic (GCLC). In conclusion, these results demonstrated that HD could activate the Nrf2 pathway in ducks to reduce the hepatotoxicity driven by AFB1. This finding also provides theoretical and data support for a deeper understanding of the toxic mechanisms of AFB1 and its prevention.

Advances in clinical diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury in children / 中华肝脏病杂志

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most common adverse drug reactions that may seriously threaten the health of children and is receiving increasing clinical attention day by day. There is still no independent diagnosis and treatment guideline for DILI in children, but its clinical features are not completely similar to those in adults. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment progress in order to provide a reference for the management of DILI in children.

Comparative analysis of clinical diagnosis and treatment guidelines for drug-induced liver injury at home and abroad / 中华肝脏病杂志

Drug-induced liver injury influencing factors are complex and have diverse clinical manifestations. Simple and reliable diagnostic methods are still deficient, and further classification of toxicological mechanisms is required. There are numerous pertinent discrepancies between domestic and international guidelines aimed at drug-induced liver injury diagnosis and treatment, with partial to no consensus on the content. The American Gastroenterological Association's 2021 Clinical Guidelines, the Asia-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver's 2021 Consensus Guidelines, the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences' 2020 International Consensus, the European Society's Hepatology Committee's 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the 2015 Chinese Medical Association Guidelines are five influential clinical guidelines on drug-induced liver injury at home and abroad. The epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and evaluation, treatment management, and other contents, particularly traditional Chinese medicine, were compared and analyzed using other relevant consensus opinions or guidelines in order to improve understanding and provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury.

Standardize the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury, and strengthen clinical and translational research / 中华肝脏病杂志

As a liver disease with the most complex clinical phenotype, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) poses great challenges in diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Although guidelines based on the latest research advances can provide clinicians with guidance on the identification, diagnosis, and management of DILI, the overall level of evidence in this field is relatively low and high-level evidence is limited. Therefore, we should interpret guidelines with caution and look forward to more clinical and translational research to address the huge unmet clinical needs in DILI.

Chinese guideline for diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury (2023 version) / 中华肝脏病杂志

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important adverse drug reaction that can lead to acute liver failure or even death in severe cases. Currently, the diagnosis of DILI still follows the strategy of exclusion. Therefore, a detailed history taking and a thorough and careful exclusion of other potential causes of liver injury is the key to correct diagnosis. This guideline was developed based on evidence-based medicine provided by the latest research advances and aims to provide professional guidance to clinicians on how to identify suspected DILI timely and standardize the diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Based on the clinical settings in China, the guideline also specifically focused on DILI in chronic liver disease, drug-induced viral hepatitis reactivation, common causing agents of DILI (herbal and dietary supplements, anti-tuberculosis drugs, anti-neoplastic drugs), and signal and assessment of DILI in clinical trials.